Decision Assurance Infrastructure
Summit Cognitive
§ Solutions

Same infrastructure. Pick your door.

Nobody wakes up wanting decision assurance. You arrive with a mandate, a memo, or an audit finding — and a workflow that has to survive it. These pages are organized the way the problem actually arrives: by who you are, by what you must accomplish, or by the framework you answer to.

§ 01

By buyer

Three audiences, three operating realities. Each page speaks the language of the people who will examine your decisions.

No receipt → no decision

Federal & Defense→

BAA-ready research thrusts, ATO evidence packages, NIST 800-53 mappings, air-gapped deployment — from a HUBZone small business.
Pass every audit

Regulated Enterprise→

Finance, healthcare, legal. AI in decisions a regulator or court will examine — with proof your compliance team can stand behind.
Prove with Summit

Partners & Integrators→

Identity platforms, governance platforms, primes. Your stack governs; Summit makes the result provable against an open standard.
§ 02

By mission

Four jobs that bring teams to us. Each maps to a platform surface and ends in the same place: receipts you can defend.

Mission

Audit-Ready AI Decisions→

An audit or examination is coming, and AI-assisted work is in scope. Receipts are the audit artifact — produced by the system, not assembled the week before.
Mission

Govern Autonomous Agents→

Agents are getting tool access, and someone just asked what stops them from doing X. Default-deny is the answer; replay is the proof.
Mission

Verify Multi-Agent Systems→

Coordinated agents where deadlock or conflict is unacceptable. Model-check the coordination before fielding; carry the certificate into the safety case.
Mission

Threat Intelligence→

Analytic judgments that must survive challenge, interoperating over TAXII/STIX 2.1 with the tooling you already run.
§ 03

By framework

If a framework sent you here, start with its page. Each one states the mandate in plain language, lists the artifacts Summit produces against it, and is honest about what alignment means — we map and support; we don't certify what we haven't earned.

Framework

NIST AI RMF→

GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE — receipts as the evidence layer, with 20 NIST 800-53 control implementation statements.
Framework

CMMC→

Receipt-backed evidence for assessment objectives, built for the defense industrial base.
Framework

FedRAMP→

Decision evidence for continuous monitoring and supply-chain risk — for SaaS providers and the agencies that authorize them.
Framework

ISO/IEC 42001→

An AI management system runs on records. Receipts are the operational record-keeping an AIMS audit wants to see.
Framework

EU AI Act→

Record-keeping, logging, and traceability for high-risk AI systems — as a property of the system, not a policy document.

Not sure which door is yours?

Start with the workflow someone will eventually have to defend. The 10-Day Decision Assurance Pilot instruments it, receipts every decision in it, and tells you in writing what your current review process misses.

Start a PilotExplore the Platform