Decision Assurance Infrastructure
Summit Cognitive
§ Solutions — Audit-Ready AI Decisions

The audit is scheduled. The evidence isn't.

Somewhere on your calendar is an audit, an examination, or an internal review that will touch AI-assisted work for the first time. The question it will ask is simple: show us how these decisions were made. Logs answer what happened. They do not answer why, from what evidence, under which policy — and they cannot be replayed to prove it.

§ 01

Logging is not evidence

One documented organization, audited on its AI-assisted decisions, could not explain or reproduce sixty percent of them — every output was logged. The gap between a log line and an audit artifact is the gap this page closes.

What you have

A log records the output

Timestamped text. No verified sources, no policy context, no proof the entry wasn't produced — or altered — after the fact.
What they ask for

An auditor needs the decision

What was considered, what was excluded, which rules were evaluated, who approved it, and whether the same inputs produce the same result today.
What Summit issues

A receipt is both

A signed, self-contained evidence package issued at decision time — independently verifiable, deterministically replayable, admissible by construction.
§ 02

The artifacts an audit actually consumes

Summit produces three things for an audit, all generated from live receipts — none assembled by hand the week before fieldwork.

Artifact 1

The receipt corpus→

Every AI-assisted decision in the scoped workflow, receipted: evidence with hash verification, policy evaluation results, actor identity, signature. Sampling-friendly and independently verifiable — your auditor doesn't have to trust us, or you.
Artifact 2

The evidence export→

The compliance evidence exporter renders receipts into the formats assessment programs consume — control-mapped evidence bundles, including artifacts aligned to the 20 published NIST 800-53 control implementation statements.
Artifact 3

The findings memo→

A written governance findings memo: what machine review caught that human review missed. Delivered before the auditor finds it — which is the entire point.
SUM-RCPT-v1-9a04…d27cREVIEW
decision
claims-disposition.0288
evidence
4 sources · 1 hash mismatch
policy
11/12 rules passed · 1 flagged
routed
human review queue · pending
replay
deterministic · available
signature
ed25519:c1f8…77b2 · valid

fig. 1 — a flagged decision, caught at issuance instead of at fieldwork.

§ 03

Working backward from the audit date

Ten days of instrumentation is enough to change what you can produce at fieldwork. Start with the workflow the audit plan names.

  1. 01
    Scope to the audit plan
    One workflow that the upcoming audit will sample. Decisions in that workflow get receipts from day one.
  2. 02
    Run the pilot
    Ten days, fixed price. Receipt corpus, policy evaluation report, and governance findings memo — deliverables in writing.
  3. 03
    Walk in with proof
    When the request-for-evidence arrives, the response is an export, not a project.

Be the easiest audit they run this year.

The 10-Day Decision Assurance Pilot instruments the workflow your audit will sample and finishes with the artifacts your auditor will ask for — receipts, evidence export, findings memo.

Start a PilotHow receipts work